Understanding Dividend Investing in Today's Low-Yield Environment

The legendary Jack Bogle once noted that "successful investing is about owning businesses and reaping the huge rewards provided by the dividends and earnings growth of our nation's—and, for that matter, the world's—corporations." This insight remains particularly pertinent in today's market, where the value of equity ownership extends beyond simply capturing price movements to include the steady income that companies distribute to shareholders as their earnings expand.

Currently, financial markets are trading near record levels while dividend yields have fallen to historic lows, with the S&P 500 expected to yield approximately 1.3% in the coming year. Such minimal yields haven't been witnessed since the dot-com era of 2000. The Federal Reserve's rate-cutting cycle and evolving interest rate landscape further influence how investors might structure their portfolios for income generation in this environment.

Although dividend-paying investments might appear mundane compared to momentum-driven stocks that capture headlines and investor enthusiasm, their portfolio significance shouldn't be underestimated. These payments accumulate through compounding and deliver consistent income streams, particularly valuable when equity prices experience volatility. Businesses that successfully combine regular dividend distributions with appreciating share values over extended timeframes can potentially deliver dual benefits: ongoing cash generation plus wealth accumulation.

Current market conditions reflect decades of transformation in corporate capital allocation strategies and investor preferences. How might investors effectively integrate both capital gains and dividend income in today's portfolio construction?

Investor attitudes toward dividends have transformed across decades

Dividend investing has undergone significant evolution throughout the past century. During most of the 1900s, dividend payments represented the primary driver of equity returns, with yields frequently surpassing 5 to 7%. Shareholders approached stock ownership similarly to bond investing today – primarily seeking the income these investments produced. Corporations faced expectations to maintain and increase their dividend payments as evidence of robust financial performance, while stock price gains were often viewed as secondary to dividend income.

This perspective shifted as investors increasingly gravitated toward technology-focused enterprises and growth opportunities. The 1990s dot-com period further diminished dividend emphasis as rapidly expanding technology firms not only reinvested their capital internally but were actually expected to avoid dividend payments. Share repurchase programs simultaneously gained popularity as a more tax-advantaged method of returning capital to shareholders compared to dividends.

Contemporary low yields demonstrate this transformation. The accompanying chart illustrates how technology-oriented sectors including Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Communication Services provide the most modest dividend yields at 0.6%, 0.7%, and 0.8% respectively. These sectors encompass the Magnificent 7 companies which typically distribute minimal dividends or none whatsoever.

Conversely, sectors like Real Estate, Energy, and Utilities that have historically emphasized income production continue offering yields exceeding 3%, indicating that substantial dividends remain accessible through diversification across various market segments.

This broader market pattern of reduced dividend yields isn't inherently problematic since it represents evolving market forces and business approaches that can advantage investors in distinct ways. Nevertheless, it underscores the significance of comprehending dividend purposes for corporations, investors, and portfolio management.

Business strategy and monetary policy influence dividend appeal

From a corporate standpoint, earnings can be allocated through two primary channels: reinvestment in business operations or cash distribution to shareholders via dividends. Theoretically, companies should return capital to investors when they possess sufficient funding for compelling investment opportunities or when their business model specifically targets shareholder income generation, such as REITs (real estate investment trusts).

Nevertheless, dividends fulfill broader objectives beyond merely distributing surplus cash. Numerous corporations maintain consistent dividend payments to attract investors and communicate financial strength, especially when they can showcase steady growth in these distributions over time. This dividend expansion acts as a marker of corporate wellness and management optimism regarding future profitability, extending beyond income considerations alone.

Interest rates and Federal Reserve monetary policy additionally influence dividend-paying stock attractiveness. When Treasury yields surpass dividend yields, they diminish the comparative appeal of these equities. Presently, with 10-year Treasury yields approximately 4.1%, government bonds provide considerably higher income than the broader equity market. As the Fed maintains its rate-cutting trajectory, this relationship may evolve.

The accompanying chart displays a related measure called the "earnings yield," occasionally termed the "equity risk premium." This metric evaluates stock attractiveness relative to Treasurys. The recent years' declining trend results from equities reaching new peaks amid elevated interest rates. The stabilization of interest rates within a recent range explains why the relative earnings yield has leveled off this year.

Dividends represent a crucial investor consideration

For investors, dividends constitute an essential component of total portfolio returns. Standard and Poor's data indicates that dividends have generated 31% of S&P 500 total returns since 1926, while price appreciation has provided 69%. (1) Today, individual investors appear to concentrate primarily on stock prices except when portfolio income becomes necessary, such as for those approaching or already in retirement.

The accompanying chart demonstrates that $1 invested in equities in 1926 expanded to roughly $18,000 by 2025, illustrating compound growth's potency across extended periods. This expansion originated from both dividends and price appreciation, though the particular combination fluctuated across different eras. Some decades saw dividends delivering the majority of returns. In others, stock price gains predominated. The consistent factor was the significance of maintaining investment exposure through various market cycles, regardless of return drivers.

For investors nearing or experiencing retirement, attention naturally transitions toward current income generation. However, this doesn't necessarily require exclusive concentration on high-dividend equities. The danger of "yield chasing" – prioritizing solely the highest-yielding investments – lies in potentially creating poor diversification, concentration in unsustainable companies and sectors, and diminished growth potential for today's extended retirement periods.

Therefore, investors should establish suitable dividend and growth balance aligned with their financial objectives. This "total return" methodology helps ensure portfolios can produce appropriate returns across varying market conditions, whether through dividends, capital appreciation, or both.

The bottom line? Although dividend yields remain near historical lows, they maintain significant portfolio importance. Investors should emphasize both price appreciation and dividends while pursuing their financial objectives.

Questions?  We offer a complimentary 15-minute call to discuss your concerns and explore how we can assist you.

1. https://www.spglobal.com/spd

Stordahl Capital Management, Inc is a Registered Investment Adviser. This commentary is solely for informational purposes and reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. and should not be regarded as a description of advisory services or performance returns of any SCM Clients. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. Nothing in this piece constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Stordahl Capital Management and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. No advice may be rendered by Stordahl Capital Management unless a client service agreement is in place. Stordahl Capital Management, Inc provides links for your convenience to websites produced by other providers or industry-related material. Accessing websites through links directs you away from our website. Stordahl Capital Management is not responsible for errors or omissions in the material on third-party websites and does not necessarily approve of or endorse the information provided. Users who gain access to third-party websites may be subject to the copyright and other restrictions on use imposed by those providers and assume responsibility and risk from the use of those websites. Please note that trading instructions through email, fax, or voicemail will not be taken. Your identity and timely retrieval of instructions cannot be guaranteed. Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. manages its clients’ accounts using a variety of investment techniques and strategies, which are not necessarily discussed in the commentary. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Copyright (c) 2024 Clearnomics, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not necessarily complete and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of the information and opinions contained herein. The views and the other information provided are subject to change without notice. All reports posted on or via www.clearnomics.com or any affiliated websites, applications, or services are issued without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific recipient and are not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future results. Company fundamentals and earnings may be mentioned occasionally, but should not be construed as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold the company's stock. Predictions, forecasts, and estimates for any and all markets should not be construed as recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security--including mutual funds, futures contracts, and exchange traded funds, or any similar instruments. The text, images, and other materials contained or displayed in this report are proprietary to Clearnomics, Inc. and constitute valuable intellectual property. All unauthorized reproduction or other use of material from Clearnomics, Inc. shall be deemed willful infringement(s) of this copyright and other proprietary and intellectual property rights, including but not limited to, rights of privacy. Clearnomics, Inc. expressly reserves all rights in connection with its intellectual property, including without limitation the right to block the transfer of its products and services and/or to track usage thereof, through electronic tracking technology, and all other lawful means, now known or hereafter devised. Clearnomics, Inc. reserves the right, without further notice, to pursue to the fullest extent allowed by the law any and all criminal and civil remedies for the violation of its rights.

Stordahl Capital Management