The Week in Review: September 29, 2025
The summary below is provided for educational purposes only. Please let me know if you have any questions or want to discuss any other matters.
Reductions in Interest Rates and Market Response—Historical Review
A couple of weeks ago, the Federal Reserve cut its key rate, the fed funds rate, by a quarter-percentage point to 4.00-4.25%. It’s the first rate cut since last December.
So, is this one and done, or will there be a series of rate reductions? A speech delivered last week by Fed Chief Powell wasn’t overly dovish, but the Fed meets two more times this year, and Powell left the door open to at least one more rate cut in 2025.
When the Federal Reserve shifts its policy stance, it often sparks a wave of questions, especially among investors given the Fed’s historical influence on market behavior. One question that comes to mind is how might lower interest rates impact stocks?
To help answer that, the table below offers a historical perspective on how the S&P 500 has responded to previous rate-cutting cycles.
On average, rate cuts have helped fuel market advances, which is highlighted above.
But there are two glaring exceptions: 2001 and 2007. During those periods, the economy was sliding into a recession as rate cuts began. The 1990 recession began one year after the first cut.
Rate cuts in 2001-02 and in 2007-08 were in response to weakening economic conditions that were leading to a recession. Rate cuts alone were not enough to prevent an economic contraction.
During a recession, corporate profits fall as economic activity declines, more than offsetting any tailwinds provided by a looser monetary policy.
In summary, when the Federal Reserve ‘can’ cut rates, meaning inflation is under control and the economy is stable, it’s often seen as a positive signal. It suggests the Fed has flexibility and can proactively support growth or ease financial conditions. Investors tend to respond favorably because it implies a “soft landing” scenario and continued profit growth.
On the other hand, when the Fed is ‘forced’ to cut rates—typically due to economic distress, recession risks, or financial instability—it’s viewed as a reactive measure. That can trigger concerns about underlying economic weakness, leading to more cautious or even negative market reactions.
Market Summary
TWO FOR THE ROAD
Citigroup had another “oops” moment this summer. This time, it was a $6 billion fat-finger fund transfer. It comes on the heels of last year’s eyebrow-raising blunder when a client account briefly showed $81 trillion (yes…with a “T”). While nothing stuck, it’s a reminder that even the biggest banks can trip over a simple mistake like a copy/paste error. For the rest of us? It proves the value of double-checking transfers… even if our errors don’t usually add up to the GDP of Germany. - StockTwits, July 2, 2025
According to the Federal Reserve, there are 114 billion pennies in circulation, or $1.14 billion, or 0.006% of the money in circulation. It costs $192 million a year to produce pennies, about 4% of the Mint’s operating budget but only 0.00003% of the U.S. federal budget.- CNBC, February 10, 2025
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns.
I hope you have a great week!
Warmest Regards,
Bill Stordahl, CFP®
Managing Director
Stordahl Capital Management
Stordahl Capital Management, Inc is a Registered Investment Adviser. This commentary is solely for informational purposes and reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. and should not be regarded as a description of advisory services or performance returns of any SCM Clients. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. Nothing in this piece constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Stordahl Capital Management and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. No advice may be rendered by Stordahl Capital Management unless a client service agreement is in place. Stordahl Capital Management, Inc provides links for your convenience to websites produced by other providers or industry-related material. Accessing websites through links directs you away from our website. Stordahl Capital Management is not responsible for errors or omissions in the material on third-party websites and does not necessarily approve of or endorse the information provided. Users who gain access to third-party websites may be subject to the copyright and other restrictions on use imposed by those providers and assume responsibility and risk from the use of those websites. Please note that trading instructions through email, fax, or voicemail will not be taken. Your identity and timely retrieval of instructions cannot be guaranteed. Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. manages its clients’ accounts using a variety of investment techniques and strategies, which are not necessarily discussed in the commentary. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
1. The Dow Jones Industrials Average is an unmanaged index of 30 major companies which cannot be invested into directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
2. The NASDAQ Composite is an unmanaged index of companies which cannot be invested into directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
3. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 larger companies which cannot be invested into directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
4. The Global Dow is an unmanaged index composed of stocks of 150 top companies. It cannot be invested into directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
5. CME Group front-month contract; Prices can and do vary; past performance does not guarantee future results.
6. CME Group continuous contract; Prices can and do vary; past performance does not guarantee future results.