The Week in Review: March 20, 2023
Not a George Bailey Moment
George Bailey is the fictional charter in the 1946 classic It’s a Wonderful Life. Set mostly in the 1920s and 1930s, George runs the Building & Loan, a thrift that’s besieged by worried depositors. George appealed to his customers not to panic, and the Building & Loan survived.
It’s a fictional account. Many banks in the 1930s weren’t so lucky. Neither was Silicon Valley Bank.
Unable to find a buyer last weekend, the government guaranteed all deposits above the FDIC limit.
The same held true for Signature Bank, which was shuttered Sunday, March 12. SB had a large presence in the cryptocurrency space. Like SVB, it had a high percentage of uninsured deposits.
Without a buyer, the government feared a run on other larger regional banks, which likely would have triggered a serious financial crisis and a steep recession.
On top of the deposit guarantee, the Fed launched a program that provides additional funding to banks that are saddled with high-quality bonds that have lost value amid the jump in rates (bond prices move in the opposite direction of yields).
Swiss cheese
Both programs helped soothe frayed nerves until Swiss-based Credit Suisse (CS) reported that it found “material weaknesses” in its financial reporting. Credit Suisse has been a long-running train wreck, but the timing exacerbated anxieties.
On Thursday, Switzerland’s central bank provided a $50 billion rescue package (Wall Street Journal), alleviating near-term worries. Over the weekend, UBS offered $1 billion to take over the bank (Wall Street Journal).
Standing in the gap
Swift action by the U.S. Treasury, FDIC, and the Federal Reserve helped contain what could have been a very ugly day on Monday, March 13.
But this isn’t 2008 when borrowers were defaulting on hundreds of billions of dollars in subprime housing loans. It isn’t about souring loans. This isn’t your father’s banking crisis.
The center of today’s problem is roughly $600 billion in high-quality bonds that have lost value in bank portfolios (Wall Street Journal), and anxieties over the flight of uninsured deposits.
Furthermore, SVB failed to hedge against the possibility of higher interest rates—a huge mistake. And where were the bank regulators?
Credit Suisse has its own share of problems, but the troubled bank, which has a large global footprint, pointed out that it “is fully hedged for moves in interest rates.”
Are we out of the woods?
California-based First Republic Bank (FRC) isn’t under the microscope because it piled into long-term Treasury bonds. Instead, it has a high concentration of residential mortgages.
Unlike the 2000s, when banks freely lent to nearly everyone that wanted a home, these loans met more rigorous standards. But they were originated when rates were much lower.
Roughly 70% of First Republic’s deposits are uninsured, according to S&P Global. Following the run on SVB, fears have risen that First Republic might be next.
On Thursday, eleven banks deposited $30 billion into the lender (WSJ), helping alleviate short-term anxieties. That’s private capital, not government cash, and it was designed to reflect confidence in the bank, even if there might have been some arm-twisting.
Yet, First Republic does not hold many high-quality bonds, which would enable it to borrow from the Fed if the need arises.
Nothing to fear but fear itself
In today’s world, it’s not bad loans that are driving banking woes. It’s fear.
Uninsured deposits, ones that are over the FDIC limit, are nothing new. Yet, some folks are moving cash, and it’s still too soon to say what might be lurking under the surface. Thus far, there have been no other failures.
We might expect the crisis to slow economic growth, as banks tighten lending standards, but a recession is not yet a foregone conclusion.
In fact, the market might be helping the Fed in its quest to slow the economy and slow inflation, which would alleviate rate worries that have plagued investors.
Cash management
For years, cash management was almost an afterthought, because rates were near zero. Today, investors have choices. Keeping under the $250,000 FDIC limit is one. If you have balances that exceed the FDIC limit, we suggest considering the following three strategies.
Increase your coverage at your bank through multiple FDIC-insured accounts.*
Spread your cash across accounts at multiple banks.
Use our cash management services that utilize treasury bonds and money market mutual funds.
*Requires opening accounts in different ownership categories.
Final thoughts
A full understanding of what happened may not be available until regulators comb through the balance sheets of regional banks and review exactly what happened at SVB.
Overall, the banking system in general remains sound. Stronger capital requirements were put in place after the 2008 crisis, with a lending backstop put in place last week by the Fed.
The Federal Reserve was established in 1913 in response to the Panic of 1907. It was initially designed to address bank panics. Its initial purpose was to lend when no one else was willing.
But recent events are a reminder that confidence is the cornerstone of the financial system. We place funds in banks because we expect immediate, unfettered, and full access to those funds.
If you have questions in today’s uncertain environment, please let me know. We’re simply an email or phone call away.
Two for the Road
U.S. productivity growth has averaged 1.4% annually since 2005, below the 2.2% post-World War II average. Returning to historical rates could generate $10 trillion in U.S. GDP by 2030. -McKinsey Global Institute, February 20, 2023
The Federal Railroad Administration, which has been monitoring annual train accidents across America since 1975, has recorded more than 12,500 derailments in the last decade alone. That’s equivalent to some 24 trains veering off track every single week. - Chartr, March 3, 2023
This commentary reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints and analyses of the Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded as a description of advisory services provided by Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. or performance returns of any Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. Investments client. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. Nothing in this piece constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Accessing websites through links directs you away from our website. Stordahl Capital Management is not responsible for errors or omissions in the material on third party websites and does not necessarily approve of or endorse the information provided. Users who gain access to third party websites may be subject to the copyright and other restrictions on use imposed by those providers and assume responsibility and risk from the use of those websites. Please note that trading instructions through email, fax or voicemail will not be taken. Your identity and timely retrieval of instructions cannot be guaranteed. Stordahl Capital Management, Inc. manages its clients’ accounts using a variety of investment techniques and strategies, which are not necessarily discussed in the commentary. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
1. The Dow Jones Industrials Average is an unmanaged index of 30 major companies which cannot be invested into directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
2. The NASDAQ Composite is an unmanaged index of companies which cannot be invested into directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
3. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 larger companies which cannot be invested into directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
4. The Global Dow is an unmanaged index composed of stocks of 150 top companies. It cannot be invested into directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
5. CME Group front-month contract; Prices can and do vary; past performance does not guarantee future results.
6. CME Group continuous contract; Prices can and do vary; past performance does not guarantee future results.